Skip to Content

September 2009

Health care bill: The movie? (Politico)

In a world where health care reform is under siege and fear and confusion reign, President Barack Obama has only one way out — to release a different movie. 
Opponents of the current reform effort have been hawking a nail-biter of a horror flick: Faceless government bureaucrats take over the health care system, destroy innovation, eliminate choice and empower government “death panels” to decide whether Grandma will live or die. 
The Democrats, on the other hand, have three different versions of a 1,018-page bill in the House, seemingly endless negotiations in the Senate and a feud over something called the “public option.” 
“Marley & Me,” this is not. 
“We’re talking a lot about what’s our shooting schedule, who’s our key grip going to be, who’s going to do special effects, and we’re not telling the story enough,” says Eli Attie, former chief speechwriter for Vice President Al Gore and a writer and producer for “The West Wing” and “House, M.D.” 
Strategists say that if the president hopes to turn the tide in favor of reform, he will need do more than offer policy prescriptions when he addresses Congress on Wednesday; he will have to generate a tight, vivid, emotionally compelling narrative to help people understand why they should get behind the plan. 
But should he pen his own scary movie? A family drama? A feel-good film? 
POLITICO asked those who straddle the worlds of politics and entertainment to offer their thoughts on how health reform advocates should pitch a wary public. 
David Mixner, a longtime Democratic activist and a writer with two screenplays to his credit, recommends a straightforward drama: “A hardworking American family who has a young sick child, who has done everything right, suddenly sees their life upended, because of a lack of health insurance, or technicalities in their health insurance,” he says. 
“To me, [the message is] real simple: We can no longer have Americans lose everything they’ve ever worked for because they’re sick. And this stops it," he says. "And I don’t know why we’ve strayed from that in some kind of zoopgobbledygook that no one understands.”
Attie agrees and expresses similar frustration with the Democrats’ failure to assert their own message. 
“That we’ve become the pro-death party when they want to leave 45 million people uninsured is insane,” he says. “Their movie is the one where everyone dies in the end. Theirs is the slasher film, and ours is the heartwarming family drama.” 
So what would a screenplay that made that argument look like? “It’s a story of an average American family facing all kinds of medical bills they can’t pay, health problems they can’t treat, medications they can’t buy and a knight in shining armor named Barack Obama comes along, and they all live happily ever after,” Attie says. “You think it’s going to be a tragedy, and it isn’t.” 
Others argue that the opposition’s message has an edge-of-the seat urgency that requires more of a blockbuster response.
“There’s passion on the other side, and I don’t hear passion on the side of reform, and that’s maddening to me,” says Trey Ellis, a screenwriter and novelist whose credits include the HBO film “The Tuskegee Airmen,” and who blogs about politics for the Huffington Post.
He suggests a thriller — “along the lines of ‘Michael Clayton,’ ‘The Insider’ and ‘Traffic’” — that would reveal the human drama behind the status quo.
“The pre-credit sequence would show a young woman driving home from a party. She's the only sober one of her friends. Wham! A cab slams into them, totaling her little BMW and severely injuring only her. The ambulance comes and is racing her to the nearest hospital, which is private, when the paramedics are told, by her shaken friends, that she's uninsured. The paramedics are ordered to take her to the public hospital, 10 miles away ...
Fat-cat health insurance oligarchs meet at Hilton Head, blithely bragging about their profits and the joys of ‘rescission.’ ... One of the oligarchs gets an urgent call. It's his wife. Their estranged daughter has just been in an accident. She lost a leg because of the transfer to the more distant hospital.” 

The insurance companies aren’t the only potential villain in a Democrat-directed drama about the need for health reform, says Democratic strategist Chris Lehane, who consulted on the publicity effort for Michael Moore’s health care documentary, “Sicko.”

“Historically, successful presidents create a dialectic with their über-message, where they are positioned as fighting for the American people and against a threat to America,” he says.

His film would be a Cold War-style chiller, with “jobs being swallowed up by foreign countries” and Obama and the Democrats in a race against time to save the nation from the “greedy insurance and drug industries,” which are sucking the nation dry financially. Their mission? To preserve “the core of what it means to be American," he says, "in an age where the rise of global challengers such as China imperils the American Dream.”

From Lehane’s geopolitical crane shot, Democratic strategist Shawn Lawrence Otto, who wrote and produced the film “House of Sand and Fog,” pans in on a small American town, suggesting that the Democrats look for inspiration in the Christmas favorite “It’s a Wonderful Life.”

“I guess the log line is: Democrats are the party of Bedford Falls. It’s your choice: Bedford Falls or Potterville,” he says.

Variety managing editor Ted Johnson, who writes the Wilshire & Washington blog about the intersection of entertainment and politics, also invokes the Frank Capra classic.

“It seems like one of their troubles is that the Republicans have been so effective in capitalizing on the mistrust of government,” he says of the Democrats. “Whereas ‘It’s A Wonderful Life’ doesn’t really deal with the government — it’s about this idea that we’re all in this together.”

Republican media consultant Stuart Stevens, who has written for TV series including “Commander in Chief” and “K Street,” says he thinks that thus far the Democrats’ message has been “oddly torqued”: “It’s a weird mix of change and status quo that hasn’t tied up: ‘If you like what you have, you don’t have to change’ — a status quo message — ‘but we’re going to bring significant change if you want it.’ It’s sort of like you’re at the Oxford Union, and Obama’s debating Obama,” he says.

He, too, mentions “It’s a Wonderful Life” — “You have to show people what the future’s going to look like. And if we don’t change, what’s it going to be like?” — but predicts that Democrats will offer up their own horror movie instead.

“Our health care system is collapsing. We’re going to be unable to sustain what we have. You have to fight to protect what you have. The demographic monster is coming to get us, and we have to fight that. It’s sort of a ‘while America slept’ argument,” he says. “I suspect that’s where they’re headed, because when emotions get that high, fear works more easily.”

Fear may indeed sell, but Attie notes that “downer moves are tanking at the box office” right now. He argues that what people want to hear most is an uplifting story about the future. “Yes, some horror movies are doing well,” he says, “but not as well as ‘Star Trek’ or ‘Transformers,’ movies about truth, justice and the American way — with robots.”

Read More Stories from POLITICOBeck up, left let down and Jones defiantLabor Day activitiesNJ governor's race gets down and dirtyOpen mic weekendVan Jones and the W.H. casualty list

Obama To Address Joint Session of Congress (CQPolitics.com)

Seeking to hit the reset button on the acrimonious health care debate, President Obama will address a joint session of Congress on Sept. 9 and renew his call to pass legislation retooling the health insurance market this year.

Obama is likely to more thoroughly detail his expectations for an overhaul, including what he deems an acceptable fallback to a public insurance plan that would compete against private insurers.

The White House has concluded it doesn't have the votes in the Senate to pass a plan that includes a public insurance option. The administration is considering other options, including a non-profit "co-ops" that would be governed by private boards.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., invited the president to make the speech next Wednesday evening, as is required under protocol, a congressional aide said. Logistics for the speech are still being worked out.

Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., also will meet with Obama at the White House on Sept. 8 -- the day Congress returns from its five-week summer recess -- to discuss the fall legislative agenda with Obama, the aide said. Health care is expected to top the list of subjects to be discussed.

Obama's address follows a caucus of House Democrats on Sept. 9 to thrash out how they want to proceed on bringing a health care bill (HR 3200) to the floor in September.

That caucus also will give the lawmakers a chance to compare notes about the meetings they held in their districts durin the recess -- meetings in which many of them encountered fierce opposition from critics of Democratic health care plans.

While Democrats in the House generally say they are still committed to the idea of a health care overhaul, it remains to be seen if support for the public option remains sufficient to include it in the final House version of an overhaul plan.

The House version will be created by merging bills already the Energy and Commerce, Ways and Means and Education and Labor committees have already approved.

Lawmakers said Obama needs to take a more hands-on role guiding the health care debate. Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, told an editorial-board meeting of the Des Moines Register today that the president has to make his case to the American people, because of the fierce opposition that surfaced at town hall meetings during the August recess.

"President Obama has to step up and sort of tell the American people, 'Here's what we need to do. Here's what we should do. Here's what the health plan should encompass, and here's what I think we should fight for,'" said Harkin, who serves on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. "I think the longer we delay this, the more misinformation gets out among people. I think we have to wrap this up, hopefully by Christmas time."

The White House has been increasingly critical of Republicans that administration officials contend are not bargaining in good faith over contours of a health plan.

White House press secretary Robert Gibbs on Tuesday lashed out at two Republican lawmakers involved in the talks -- Michael B. Enzi of Wyoming and Charles E. Grassley of Iowa -- for criticizing Democratic plans during appearances in their home states.

However, Obama is likely to use the address to enumerate issues on which Democrats and many Republicans agree, including proposed regulations barring health insurers from basing coverage decisions on individuals' health conditions. House Republican Leader John A. Boehner of Ohio, who has called on Obama to scrap his health care ideas and start over, said he hoped the president uses his speech to do just that.

"Obviously, we want to hear what the president has to say, but the American people don't want a new speech, they want a new plan. We need to scrap the Democrats' government takeover of health care and start over on a real, bipartisan plan for reform," said Boehner spokesman Michael Steel.

The address will mark the second time Obama will speak to a joint session of Congress this year. The first on Feb. 24, came in lieu of a State of the Union address, and primarily focused on the financial crisis.

Edward Epstein and Bart Jansen contributed to this story.

Andy Lau apologizes for lying about marriage (AP)

HONG KONG – Veteran Hong Kong actor-singer Andy Lau has apologized for lying about his marriage, saying he behaved inappropriately for a public figure.
Lau denied that he was married in an interview with Hong Kong's Cable TV in February, but Hong Kong journalists last week discovered marriage records from the Clark County Recorder's Office in the U.S. state of Nevada that showed the 47-year-old star had wed Malaysian girlfriend Carol Chu in June 2008. Lau confirmed the nuptials in a brief message on his Web site late Saturday, saying he did not announce the marriage because he wanted to shield Chu from the press.
Speaking publicly about the issue for the first time Tuesday afternoon, Lau said he was sorry he deceived the press and the public.
"My recent behavior amounts to a lie. It disappointed many people. Because I'm a public figure, I think I should publicly apologize to everyone who believed me. I hope everyone will forgive me," Lau told reporters at Hong Kong's international airport after returning from Beijing, where he was filming a music video.
Critics say Lau lied about his marriage to protect his image as an idol. One of Asia's biggest celebrities, the star of "Infernal Affairs" and "House of Flying Daggers" has appeared in more than 100 movies since his debut in 1982. Dubbed one of Chinese pop's "Four Heavenly Kings" in the 1990s, he also enjoys a successful recording career.
Lau denied Tuesday that he and his wife have any children.
He said on his Web site Saturday he and Chu had married so they could try to have children through artificial insemination, which is only authorized for married couples in Hong Kong.
"I don't have any children. I don't have any sons or daughters. The children you have photographed are the children of my relatives or friends," he said.

2016 Olympics bidders await IOC evaluation report (AP)

LONDON – The four cities bidding for the 2016 Olympics are set to find out how they shape up — on paper at least.
The International Olympic Committee will release its evaluation report Wednesday assessing the bids from Chicago, Madrid, Rio de Janeiro and Tokyo.
The report — issued exactly a month before the secret vote in Copenhagen on Oct. 2 — won't grade or rank the candidates, focusing instead on technical criteria such as venues, budgets, transportation plans, accommodation, security and government and public support.
The report, based on visits by the evaluation commission earlier this year, is not expected to offer any dramatic findings or provide any clear-cut winner or losers. However, it should list some potential criticisms or concerns.
Among the issues under scrutiny could be Chicago's financial guarantees. Unlike other bid cities, Chicago's candidacy is not underwritten by the federal government. Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley has pledged to sign the host contract, requiring the city to take full financial responsibility for the games and the proposed $4.8 billion operating budget.
With IOC members still barred from visiting bid cities in the wake of the Salt Lake City scandal, the report is intended to offer guidance to the 100-plus delegates when they cast their ballots next month.
"It could be very important," said Gerhard Heiberg, an IOC executive board member from Norway. "At this stage there is no front-runner and no one lagging behind. All are on an equal basis. The report will be studied by IOC members perhaps more than before."
Especially decisive could be the appearance of government leaders backing the bids in Copenhagen.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva and Spanish King Juan Carlos have announced they will attend. Tokyo has invited Crown Prince Naruhito. However, the biggest question is whether President Barack Obama will lobby for Chicago.
The first IOC evaluation report made public was in 1993 during the bid process for the 2000 Olympics, which were awarded to Sydney. Some members have been critical of the reports for merely listing statistics and not making clear which bids are better than others.
"Unless you were a cryptographer of some sort, in the past it's been impossible to find out what the opinion of the commission was as to the suitability of each candidate," senior Canadian member Dick Pound said.
The four candidates, meanwhile, are hoping to make a good impression in the report.
Chicago, seeking to bring the Summer Olympics back to the United States for the first time since the 1996 Atlanta Games, has been promoting its plan for holding compact games on the downtown lakefront.
"As the least well known of the four cities hopefully the full membership will have a better understanding of the type of games Chicago would offer after this report comes out," bid leader Patrick Ryan said.
Tokyo, which held the Olympics in 1964, will have a new prime minister behind the bid after Taro Aso's Liberal Democrats were voted out of office by the Democratic Party over the weekend. The likely next prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, has voiced support for the bid.
"We offer the safest, securest, most risk-free and most dependable bid," Tokyo bid leader Dr. Ichiro Kono said. "This is especially critical considering today's uncertain environment."
Madrid, which is bidding for the second straight time after losing to London in the race for the 2012 Games, believes it is well placed.
"We have worked extremely hard on every aspect of our bid and all the hard work have put us in a strong position for the final run to the finishing line," bid leader Mercedes Coghen said.

Rio de Janeiro has made a strong case to take the Olympics to South America for the first time.

"We await this report with a little bit of anxiety but confident as well," bid chief executive Carlos Roberto Osorio said. "We think we have a very strong technical project."